There is no 'best' solution, it's a matter of personal preference. I think maybe you need to spend more time with Renoise's sampler, perhaps? There's just so much it can do.Īs for why you're getting different results from the render than what you're hearing beforehand, can you be more specific? what is different? this behavior sounds wrong to me. But when it comes to sample-based work, Renoise is king! And Render to sample is definitely the best way to do what you want to do (turning sounds from VSTs into samples and then modifying them). I'm not saying Ableton is bad, I love it and have used it for years. The 'waveform' page of Renoise is a full-featured audio editor. Ableton's samplers don't offer *any* actual audio editing functions.
The moment you "render to sample" the audio appears in Renoise's sampler (as you probably know) and then it's off to the races - effects chains with parallel routings, all kinds of modulation, slicing, drum kit mapping, and an actual audio editor. The Renoise workflow is very heavily built around its sampler, which is integrated tightly with the sequencer / whole program - far more so than any other DAW, really. Ableton doesn't even have bounce-in-place functionality after all these years! What do you find restricting about it? It's a user-friendly, ultra-fast way to 'bounce' material. Render to Sample is one of the greatest features of Renoise.
0 kommentar(er)
